Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Cem Ilkel vs Elmar Ejupovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilkel vs Ejupovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Cem Ilkel vs Elmar Ejupovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ilkel 2 - 1 Ejupovic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 46.71% of points on their second serve, while Ejupovic has won 49.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 50.73% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ejupovic has won 48.59%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.25% and 25.32% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 51.97% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ejupovic has saved 65.83% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 40% of matches played (W/L 20/ 30), with Ejupovic winning 31.58% (W/L 12/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 255/ 166), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Ejupovic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 172/ 138), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 28/ 30).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 38.71% of matches (W/L 12/ 19), where as Ejupovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 34.48% of matches (W/L 10/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Ilkel winning 2 times and Ejupovic being victorious 1 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 5 and Ejupovic winning 3. The last match between Ilkel and Ejupovic was at the Turkey F15, 16-04-2016, Semifinals, Hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-2 2-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:37:40.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Ejupovic have played a deciding set 2 times, with Ilkel winning 1 times and Ejupovic 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 1, and Ejupovic 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 235.56 while Ejupovic has played against players with an average rank of 231.63.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ejupovic has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 39.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ejupovic has converted 36.63% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
407
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
2
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
602
Rank
273
High
31
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
56% (401-315)
Career Total W/L
57% (355-269)
36% (9-16)
YTD W/L
40% (8-12)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$5,215
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Cem Ilkel vs Elmar Ejupovic For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Ilkel VS Ejupovic
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Elmar Ejupovic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 3 |
| Games Won | 42 | 39 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:40 | 1:37:40 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (91/172) | 59% (101/171) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (62/91) | 64% (65/101) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 62% (50/81) | 54% (38/70) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (5/15) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (68/171) | 35% (60/172) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 2-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Cem Ilkel
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
52%
(
53 of
101)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
58%
(
28 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
39 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 7-5 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
49%
(
42 of
86)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| 3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Elmar Ejupovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 36% (9/16) | 40% (8/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 36% (20/35) | 45% (20/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 44% (219/281) | 49% (215/226) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (4/8) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 57% (4/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 30% (3/7) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.48 | 0.57 |
| Aces Total | 117 | 122 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 53 | 73 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:59 | 1:46:24 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 190.92 | 298.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (879/1532) | 62% (855/1384) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (610/879) | 73% (622/855) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (305/653) | 50% (262/529) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (38/97) | 37% (37/101) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (505/1447) | 34% (458/1353) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 41% (7/10) | 50% (8/8) |
| Futures W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (8/24) | 40% (8/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 50% (4/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 70% (10/7) | 73% (11/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 30% (10/3) | 27% (11/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (15/2) | 0% (9/0) |
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
50%
(
57 of
113)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Cem Ilkel
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ali Habib
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Elmar Ejupovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sasa Markovic
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Andres Delgadillo
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-0 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
9
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
11 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
James Kent Trotter
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
4
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
7
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Diego Bustamante
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve %
51%
(
19 of
37)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
16
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
72 of
126)
11
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
10
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
26 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
49 of
126)
113
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Ryan Seggerman
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
12
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
90%
(
38 of
42)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
37 of
43)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
9 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
20 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ilkel Vs Ejupovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Ilkel are available here and Ejupovic photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
